Home › Washington › RCW 48.43.830

Washington · in force since 2026-06-11

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.43.830 (SB 5395, Ch. 157, Laws of 2026)

Prior authorization — standards, denials, application, rules. Two provisions here touch AI, and they sit at opposite ends of the same question: one names nobody, the next names the carrier.

§ 48.43.830(3)(a)

the provision names no one

Only a licensed physician or a licensed health professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances. Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny, delay, or modify health care services.

The sentence names who may deny — a licensed physician or health professional — not who answers for the tool. The duty has no bearer in this provision.

§ 48.43.830(3)(b)

named in the operative sentence

A carrier that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall ensure all of the following:

Here the carrier is the grammatical subject, and the reach extends through its vendors. One subsection apart, the same section does both. That is why this site orders provisions, not acts.

How this page knows what it says

Document read
Codified RCW page, which serves two versions at once — until 2027-01-01 and from it. Both were read; §(3)(a) and §(3)(b) are character-identical across them.
Verbatim
Tested character by character against the retained source file. The test proves the quote matches that file. It does not prove the file is the version in force.
Curated by hand
Which provision names the bearer, and the sentence that does it. The registry stores one sentence per obligation, chosen to prove the duty — the bearer is often named elsewhere in the act.
Accessed
2026-09-17 · https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=48.43.830